RESOLUTION 84  Original Version
Amended Version This version is the one to be used in all future discussions on this matter. 
Relevant ASC decisions 24 August, 2003.

Extract from unconfirmed Minutes of the UCA Tenth Assembly, Melbourne, 17th July, 2003

                     84. MINISTRY AND MEMBERSHIP IN THE UNITING CHURCH
                         (Facilitation Group)

                         The Assembly resolved:

                         1. To note the following extracts from Assembly minute 00.25.03:

                              (a) that the Church’s faith is in the triune God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, and that the
                              Church’s work and unity are built upon the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ;

                              (b) the authority of the Scriptures as defined in the Basis of Union, acknowledging that
                              within the Church there is a range of views on questions of Biblical interpretation on
                              various matters of Christian faith and practice;

                              (c) we are bound together by Christ, and because we love the Uniting Church as part
                              of the one holy catholic and apostolic church we will continue to work together in our
                              diversity as servants of the living God.

                         2. Recognising that:

                              (i) within the Church people of faith have wrestled with integrity to interpret Scripture in relation to the issue
                             of Christian sexual ethics and have on some issues come to mutually exclusive positions;
                              (ii) there are members of the Church who have reached the conclusion that "celibacy in singleness
                              and faithfulness in marriage" is a faithful Christian standard for Christian sexual ethics;
                              (iii) there are members of the Church who have reached the conclusion that "right relationships" as
                              outlined in Uniting Sexuality and Faith is a faithful Christian standard for Christian sexual ethics; and
                              (iv) membership of the Uniting Church is open to all persons subject only to the guidance of the Basis of
                              Union, the Constitution, the Regulations and policies of the Assembly,
                               to call upon members of the Church to seek to live together in peace as people of faith, notwithstanding
                               differing views in the matter of same sex relationships.

                         3. To remind Presbyteries that:

                              (a) in considering issues related to candidature, ordination or commissioning
                                   for specified ministries, and the placement of persons in specified ministries, decisions
                                   should only be taken on a case by case basis; and

                              (b) a decision on the suitability of an applicant or candidate depends upon a wide
                                   range of criteria and may include consideration of the manner in which the applicant’s
                                   or candidate’s sexuality is expressed.

                         4. To request the Standing Committee:

                              (a) to provide guidance for Congregations and Presbyteries on how to conduct
                                   discussions on contentious issues in ways that comply with the Church’s policy on
                                   vilification and harassment;

                              (b) to seek advice for the Church on the legal implications of the relevant legislation, eg
                                   anti discrimination legislation, anti vilification legislation, etc; and advise councils of the
                                   Church of this advice; and

                              (c) to amend, on the advice of the Legal Reference Committee, Regulation 2.7.16(l)
                                   to make more explicit the role of presbyteries in the placement of people in specified
                                   ministries.

http://assembly.uca.org.au/assembly2003/newsmedia/stories/extractfrommins.htm
Released on the authority of Geoffrey Grinton (Business Manager) and Wendie Wilkie (Associate General Secretary)

DECISIONS OF THE ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE. 24 AUGUST, 2003
Copied here by FoU for the information of its members, from unofficial Minutes of the ASC as distributed to congregations by Assembly Gen. Secretary, Terence Corkin, 24 August, 2003.

Note: The ASC made decisions as set out below, and also amended the wording of Resolution 84 without altering the tenor of the original Assembly decision.  However, it also made the decision that is listed as point 5, below, which informs congregations and councils of the Church that they may elect to make ethical statements of their own, provided that there is respect for and acknowledgment of those who hold a different view; such statements do not prevent the consideration on a case-by-case basis  of individuals related to candidature, ordination or commissioning, and placement, according to proposal 84.3.
ASC DECISIONS ON MEMBERSHIP, MINISTRY AND SEXUALITY
(in light of concerns expressed on Assembly proposal 84)

The Assembly Standing Committee joyfully acknowledges that:
"The Church as the fellowship of the Holy Spirit confesses Jesus as Lord over its own life; it also confesses that Jesus is Head over all things, the beginning of a new creation, of a new humanity." (Basis of Union, para 3)

We further gratefully acknowledge that: 
"in his own strange way Christ constitutes, rules and renews [us] as his Church." (Basis of Union, para 4)

Having prayerfully met in retreat from 22 to 24 August 2003, seeking God’s will and believing this to be God’s guidance, we resolved that the Assembly Standing Committee:

STATEMENT OF APOLOGY AND REGRET

1.     Acknowledges with regret that proposal 84 and the way it was reported has evoked depths of shared suffering among members of the Church, leading to many members experiencing pain, hurt confusion and anger.

2.    Apologises to members and ministers that more was not done to make them aware in advance of the Tenth Assembly that matters of membership, ministry and sexuality would be considered by the Assembly.

CLARIFYING PROPOSAL 84

3.     (a)  Notes that  "Celibacy in singleness and faithfulness in marriage" and "Right relationships" referred to in parts 2(ii) and (iii) of proposal 84 were intended to illustrate some differing views held by church members and have never been endorsed or approved by the Assembly or its Standing Committee.

(b)    Celebrates that in the Uniting Church we have already agreed on and affirmed important matters regarding marriage, marriage preparation, marriage counseling, divorce, re-marriage, sexuality and sexual ethics (Assembly minutes 97.31.5-97.31.13) and we have adopted the  Code of Ethics and Ministry Practice which gives clear guidance about the appropriate conduct and accountability of ministers.

4.     In order to clarify the meaning of proposal 84 in accordance with the rationale presented to the Assembly, determines to act under its powers stated in Constitution clause 47 and Regulation 3.6.26 to vary proposal 84 as attached (see below.Ed.). 

5.     Informs the Church that congregations and councils of the Church who wish to state a sexual ethic may elect to do so after prayerful consideration and study of the Scriptures providing that there is respect for and acknowledgment of those who hold a different view; such statements do not prevent the consideration on a case-by-case basis of individuals related to candidature, ordination or commissioning, and placement, according to proposal 84.3.

The Amended version of Resolution 84.
 MINISTRY AND MEMBERSHIP IN THE UNITING CHURCH
(Proposal 84 as varied by the Assembly Standing Committee, 24 August 2003)
This wording of Proposal 84 is to be used in all future discussions on this matter.

"The Assembly Standing Committee, acting with the powers of the Assembly, resolved:

1. To note the following extracts from Assembly minute 00.25.03:
(a) we celebrate that the Church’s faith is in the triune God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, and that the Church’s work and unity are built upon the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ;
(b) we affirm the authority of the Scriptures as defined in the Basis of Union, acknowledging that within the Church there is a range of views on questions of Biblical interpretation on various matters of Christian faith and practice;
(c) we affirm we are bound together by Christ, and because we love the Uniting Church as part of the one holy catholic and apostolic church we will continue to work together in our diversity as servants of the living God.

2. Noting that:
(i) within the Church people of faith have wrestled with integrity to interpret Scripture in relation to the issue of Christian sexual ethics and have on some issues come to mutually exclusive positions;
(ii) membership of the Uniting Church is open to all persons subject only to the guidance of the Basis of Union, the Constitution, the Regulations and policies of the Assembly,
call upon members of the Church to seek to live together in peace as people of faith, notwithstanding differing views in the matter of same gender relationships.

3. To remind Presbyteries of the decisions of previous Assemblies that:
(a) in considering issues related to candidature, ordination or commissioning for specified ministries, and the placement of persons in specified ministries, decisions should only be taken on a case by case basis; and
(b) a decision on the suitability of an applicant or candidate depends upon a wide range of criteria and may include consideration of the manner in which the applicant’s or candidate’s sexuality is expressed.

4. To request the Standing Committee:
(a) to provide guidance for Congregations and Presbyteries on how to conduct discussions on contentious issues in ways that comply with the Church’s policy on vilification and harassment;
(b) to seek advice for the Church on the legal implications of the relevant legislation, eg anti discrimination legislation, anti vilification legislation, etc; and advise councils of the Church of this advice; and
(c) to amend, on the advice of the Legal Reference Committee, Regulation 2.7.16(l) to make more explicit the role of presbyteries in the placement of people in specified ministries."

Notes of the variations made by the Standing Committee to Proposal 84 
·    in part 1(a) the words "We celebrate" have been added, in order to be fully consistent with the resolution of the Ninth Assembly;
·    in parts 1(b) and (c) the words "we affirm" have been added, in order to be fully consistent with the resolution of the Ninth Assembly;
·    in part 2 line 1 "Recognising" has been replaced by "Noting";
·    in part 2 clauses (ii) and (iii) have been deleted;
·    in part 2 clause (iv) has been renumbered as clause (ii);
·    in part 2 last line "same sex" has been replaced by "same gender";
·    in part 3 line 1 the words "of the decisions of previous Assemblies" have been added.

Terence Corkin, Assembly General Secretary
24 August 2003
 

Copied at this site for the purposes of information sharing.

TOP

Please use your browser's BACK button to return to the previous page.

A question of terminology: "Resolution" of "Proposal"?  The original proposal as brought to the Assembly for decision is properly termed a "proposal", however, after the vote was taken it becomes a resolution of the Assembly and is no longer merely a proposal.  The ASC amended the proposal and in adopting it, it is properly called a resolution of the Assembly.  To talk of "resolution 84" is to talk about the decision and this usage will be made clearer when the Minutes are published and the minute can be quoted to refer to the decision.  To talk of "proposal 84" talks about what was brought to the Assembly prior to decison.

Language has been a problem in the past with reference to decisions of the Assembly.  I wonder if people will get it right this time? Ed.

HOME