Editorial
The
season of Pentecost is upon us once more. As we celebrate, a few
telling questions arise. Does God, in pouring out the Holy Spirit upon
all of creation, all of humanity, then turn to set barriers of
distinction among those who serve God? Are all called but to some
the word is, "Thus far and no further?" No, we say, the
spirit of Pentecost is inclusivity- where the Babel event confounded
communication, Pentecost enriched it so that all may hear the Word and
proclaim it in their lives as a Gospel of compassionate
self-emptying, of making God present for the other, the stranger and
the friend alike.
Who is the Holy Spirit? The Holy Spirit is a compassionate outpouring of the Creator and the Son. Mechtild of Magdeburg.
This
month brings a clear focus upon issues of intolerance and working
within the church to move forward in faith and unity.
The first offering is from an article written for Unity, in 1997, in
which controlled anger and indignation points to conservative,
evangelical actions, praying, "Father forgive them, for
they do not know what they are doing." Clearly Scripture is being used
to highlight a deep feeling of a ministry of death at the hands of
religious people in out time. Life in the Church is described
through the metaphor of "The Galilee", an occupied territory within
which the Gospel of liberation has its roots. Like
ancient Galilee, the writer sees his own local Geography
of Hope as an occupied land, held by contending forces of disapproval,
spiritual
violence and suppression on one hand, and life affirming hospitality,
nuture and celebration on the other. He also recognses that
many are also caught in the "messy middle" to borrow John Mavor's
classic phrase.
Two papers are also represented from our last issue. One paper by
Richard J. Mouw, presents reasons for persons of conservative viewpoint
having need of persons in community with them who have liberal views.
Barbara
Wheeler presents a case for knowing the stranger, and what she says is
alarmingly relevant.
"Richard Mouw
has acknowledged that when conservatives stay in their own
enclaves, they direct their natural combativeness at each other. When
we so-called
liberals hang out together, without those other Presbyterians, we can
be— in fact often are— smug. We are pretty sure that we are
advanced and
others
outmoded. When everyone else grows up, we believe, they will look and
think like us. In my
experience, we are less likely to slide over into snobbishness when they — those we have defined as inferior— are in the room, some of them
thinking as clearly and acting as maturely as some of us. So if one
reason for joining a
church is to get help for living more faithfully, the strange members
are important. They
make us self-conscious, and perhaps more aware that if we want more
righteousness for the
church, we may have to fix ourselves as well as those others." ( Barbara Wheeler)
While Wheeler's point is pertinent, with sound
reasoning, I do see frustration and anger among gay and
lesbian Christians who cop the bitter edge of conservative attitudes or
are simply fed up with constant harassment, misrepresentation and
denial.
Some of my friends want to tell the conservatives that they are
ignorant, with anachronistic views that are out of touch with the 21st
century, but will telling them increase the liklihood of reconsiliation
and growth? Of course, that is difficult to do when you are
repeatedly labelled "unrepentant sinners" and denigrated through Bible
abuse.
The
articles make good reading, reminding us that
the designations, 'evangelical', 'orthodox' and 'reformed' belong to
the heritage of us
all within contemporary, Protestant Christianity and not just to a
those who appropriate the terms to themselves in order to denigrate the
rest of us. If we are to
live
together as the body of Christ, we need to show tolerance. Which
brings me to the paper by Brian Phillips that expands the wisdom of
intolerance and asks, "How do we read the Bible?" Phillips points out that there are some actions
of which we are rightly intolerant.
"Bullying, manipulation,
coercion within the congregation are not to be tolerated. When
any person in the congregation - lay or ordained - attempts to push a
particular interest at the cost of denying the Gospel values of
inclusiveness, forgiveness and the search for healthy, life enhancing
community, then the only proper response is one of intolerance.
This we will not tolerate! It is contrary to the Gospel. It is
destructive of community." ( Brian Phillips)
Peace and Blessings
Wal Anderson
FoU Web Manager
LINKING TO OUR NEWSLETTER AND HOME PAGE

Detailed Report
of our discussion with the SA Moderator, Rev Dr Graham Humphris and the
Synod General Secreatry, Mr Stuart Cameron, on 13th April, 2004. An
Edited version appeared in our Newsletter.
FoU Resources are constantly being compiled and added to our web site
Subscriptions are due! $10 Waged $5 unwaged. Donations welcomed.
Make cheques payable to "Friends of Unity"
The Treasurer
PO Box 848
NORTH ADELAIDE 5006
|

A special thank you to another Friend.
Dr
Graham Elford has retired from an active role on FoU Executive.
He has been a member of FoU from the beginning, bringing wisdom,
hospitality and friendship to all who meet him.
We
are thankful for his enthusiasm, caring support and deep sense of
justice. Thank you, Graham, for helping us celebrate our lives
with grace, dignity and love.
QUOTABLES
The greatest formal talent is worthless if it does not serve a creativity which is capable of shaping a cosmos. Albert Einstein.
It is the imagination that gives shape to the Universe. Barry Lopez.
By the Grace of God I have not been fruitless. Paul 1Cor. 15:10
To act is to create and creation is for ever.
Tielhard de Chardin
A spirituality that
preaches resignation under official brutalities, servile acquiescence
in frustration and sterility, and total submision to organised
injustice is one which has lost interest in holiness and remains
concerned only with a spurious notion of "order".
Thomas Merton
When the day of
Pentecost had come, they were all together in one place. And suddenly
from heaven there came a sound like the rush of a violent wind, and it
filled the entire house where they were sitting. Divided tongues, as of
fire, appeared among them, and a tongue rested on each of them.
All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in
other languages, as the Spirit gave them ability. Luke in Acts 2:1-4
|

WHO ARE THE GAY CHRISTIANS?
We are among those who know Christ. He is our brother and our
Liberator, who suffers our wounds, feels our pain and dies for us. We
know a little of what He knew: we know what it is to love and be loved,
we also know loneliness, oppression, denial by one's own family and
friends, alienation in our places of worship, rejection of our, small
prophetic voice and we experience crucifixion. Yet we also love our
own, and the stranger, as Jesus did.
In some of our churches, we are expected to be an invisible people.
We are treated like minors, sub-adults, non-persons berated as
unrepentent sinners. We know that accusation to be a lie, for we
experience Chrsit active in our lives. When victimised, we get the blame for it- if we get harassed, it's our
problem - if we get attacked, it's because we asked for it - if we
speak out, we are flaunting ourselves or pushing our own agenda - if we
stand by our rights, we are said to be over stepping the boundaries - if we come
out to stand with pride, we are accused of recruiting children and offending
family values.
We
are seldom included in the life of the church. Welcoming and
affirming places are beacons of light in our midst, places of succour
and growth and friendship, for which we praise God. In such places, our
ministries are welcomed and appreciated, as part of the Spirit's gift
to the church. When we are
included in other places, it is to receive the ministry of others but
never to be
ministers: we may receive but never give ministry. Our rights of
passage and
our relationships are ignored; our celebrations and achievements are
never mentioned or openly celebrated with us - yet we are expected to
celebrate every "straight" right of passage and achievement, as a
matter of due course. Our suffering is sometimes alone and
in
silence. We are criticised when we complain, or lament, shout for
joy,
sing praises or seek to participate or speak with the voice of the
teacher or of the prophet! When we identify ourselves among the
ordained ministries of the Church, we experience harassment, overly
critical scrutiny and improper denial of our calling or vocation. Those
are the privileges of heterosexual Christians, or so it is assumed in
some of our churches.
We voice a different understanding, for we know of Christ's solidarity
with us, the rejected ones who are seen as being outside of the
dominant, sexual and cultural norm. When we speak to our
communities,
it is often with tears in our eyes, as we speak prophetic words of
radical inclusivity, knowing that Christ accepts us yet our churches do
not. We grieve as much for the church as for ourselves, for loss
of
intimacy and estrangement, for loss of interconnectedness, mutuality,
reciprocity and participation. Sometimes, when we rage or
complain,
our complaints are treated lightly or redirected by use of innuendo and
contradiction. Our frustrations are met with denial or even
outright
hostility. What Christ has done for us, in bringing forgiveness
and a life-fulfilling blessing and self worth, goes unrecognised. What
we do for Christ is over-looked. Our insights and
visions are veiled in a darkness that is neither of our doing, nor of
God, but is the oppressive pall of homophobia that blankets our
Christian endeavours. Like ancient Galilee, our own, local
Geography
of Hope is an occupied land, held by forces of disapproval, spiritual
violence and suppression. Some people join us in our
struggle to be
Christian, accepting us, affirming us and encouraging our
participation. Others are ambivalent, while others seek to
minister
death to us, by cutting us off, shunning our right to
participate.
Thus despised, many of us are relegated to the margins of church
existence, to be the invisible ones.
I tell you, my friend, that has not always been the case. Christ meets
us at the margin, for He has crossed the barriers of discrimination and
has recognised us, as significant witnesses to the Reign of God.
Christ has gone before us and calls us His own. Of old, we were the
hospitable ones, who nurtured, protected and assisted God's people.
It was our kind that brought Jesus gifts of gold, frankincense and
myrrh. It was our kind that ministered to Him in Bethany and gave Him
a home away from home. It was one of our kind in whom He found a
faith greater than Israel. He healed our loved ones then, as now.
In reading the Gospels we see Jesus speaking against those who tried to
use Scripture to isolate those that they deemed "reprobates and
sinners" and we are scandalised by those who seek to revert to
similar, pharisaic practices in our time. The Scriptures are used as
weapons of terror against us through an encoded language of sodomy that
does injustice to both us and the Canon. However, we read the
Scriptures with different eyes and kinder hearts. We look back and
recognise Joseph and Daniel as our brothers, Ruth and Naomi as our
sisters, and see David and Jonathan as our most celebrated lovers. We
share their story of faith, love and separation and we thank God for
telling it. We thank God for the many outcasts and eunuchs that
ministered to the People of God and stand with us as bearers of the
Reign of God.
Interestingly, the term "eunuch" is used to refer to a variety of
people in the Bible, many of whom are not castrates but a class or
caste of servants, cut-off from their families. We can relate to such
eunuchs. In fact, Rev. Nancy Wilson suggests that they may have
included gaymen in their numbers, as a special class, called
"eunuchs". They are usually shown as royal officials, who
characteristically act as go-betweens, councillors and rescuers of the
People of God. The Books of Jeremiah, Esther and Daniel contain
numerous such examples. We had a role to play, once, and we seek to
claim a role once again, not at the fringe, but as full participants,
bearers of faith and heirs to the promise. Read what Paul has written:
My point is this: heirs, as long as they are minors, are no better than
slaves, though they are the owners of all the property; but they remain
under guardians and trustees until the date set by the father. So with
us; while we were minors, we were enslaved to the elemental spirits of
the world. But when the fullness of time had come, God sent his Son,
born of a woman, born under the law, in order to redeem those who were
under the law, so that we might receive adoption as children. And
because you are children, God has sent the Spirit of his Son into our
hearts, crying, "Abba! Father!" So you are no longer a slave but a
child, and if a child then also an heir, through God. (Galatians 4:1-7)
It is our faith by which we stand justified. In faith we overcome adversity, as did Ruth and Naomi, Tamar, Rahab,
and the sons of Bathsheba and Mary, even to overcome Law and tradition. Our faith is of the order
of the centurion and of his love for his serving boy; of the mutual
love between Jesus and Lazarus and of the unnamed Ethiopian eunuch, who
read the Word and overcame barriers of distinction to claim a place
among the faithful. We know our own and claim them as our antecedents,
as, like them, we cross the boundaries of discrimination and claim our
place within the Reign of God.
When you seek to include the outcasts, remember, as you stand with
them, that you stand with Christ. If you chose to reject those who do
not fit your norms, remember that Christ died for us all, even those
who crucified Him. He died, even for those who violently enforce their
values and beliefs upon others, as He prayed, "Father forgive them, for
they do not know what they are doing."
For UNITY,
Adelaide, 1997.
Living With Diversity: Moving Beyond Religious Purity.
An extract with links from VOICE, Vol. 5.,
has proven interesting to many, and recently received mention by Stu
Camerson, Secretary of the Synod of South Australia , during
discussions
with members of the Friends of Unity Executive, on Tuesday 13 April,
2004. It provides two very useful reflections on why evangelicals
and liberals need each other. Richard Mouw points to the dangers
of further schism and isolation among themselves if conservatives isolate themselves from the
challenge of theological reflection with liberals. Barbara
Wheeler presents a case for knowing the stranger, and what she says is alarmingly relevant.
"Richard Mouw
has acknowledged that when conservatives stay in their own
enclaves, they direct their natural combativeness at each other. When
we so-called
liberals hang out together, without those other Presbyterians, we can
be— in fact often are— smug. We are pretty sure that we are
advanced and
others
outmoded. When everyone else grows up, we believe, they will look and
think like us. In my
experience, we are less likely to slide over into snobbishness when they — those we have defined as inferior— are in the room, some of them
thinking as clearly and acting as maturely as some of us. So if one
reason for joining a
church is to get help for living more faithfully, the strange members
are important. They
make us self-conscious, and perhaps more aware that if we want more
righteousness for the
church, we may have to fix ourselves as well as those others." ( Barbara Wheeler)
Links to the articles are repeated here, with an additional paper by Brian Phillips.
Why the Evangelical Church Needs the Liberal Church
(An External Link)
Paper by Richard J. Mouw, President of
Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena, California. This article is
adapted from a presentation at the Covenant Network of Presbyterians
national conference held in November in Washington, D.C. As
a conservative, evangelical voice, he speaks for Reformed orthodoxy and
the creative tension that exists when dialogue between liberal and
conservative opinion prevents the evangelicals from arguing among
themselves! As he says, "I would much
rather see us continue to focus on the major issues of Reformed thought
in an admittedly
pluralistic denomination than to deal with the tensions that often
arise among ourselves
when evangelicals get into the debates that seem inevitably to arise
when we have
established our own "pure" denominations." more...
Why the Liberal Church Needs the Evangelical Church
(An External Link)
Paper by Barbara G. Wheeler,
President of Auburn Theological Seminary in New York City. This article
is adapted from a presentation at the Covenant Network of Presbyterians
national conference held in November in Washington,D.C. In part, Wheeler says "Our side doesn’t have to agree with
conservatives about what God is seeking to change or redirect or
squelch—namely, all same-sex impulses—or about who is first in line for
change. (I suspect that God’s priority is the privileged and powerful.)
But we can stand our ground on these points and still let the
evangelicals help us balance our word to the church: inclusion and
acceptance, but also metanoia
and new life. Who knows? If evangelicals listen intently to the
testimony of faithful GLBT persons, and if our side accepts
evangelicals’ prompting to admit our need and desire to be renewed,
maybe we can strive together for a church as just and generous— and
holy— as God’s grace." More...
How do we read the Bible?
This paper by Brian Philips provides a
critical approach to questions of inclusivity. It recognises that
not all uses of Scripture are goverened by Gospel values of
inclusiveness, forgiveness and the search for healthy, life-enhancing
community. How is it then, that we continue to tolerate the use
of the Scriptures by those who have appropriated the text and its
purported meaning for their own purposes? Is it not time for us
to speak courageously and refute the arguments that use the Scriptures
in a way that denies the validity of any other way of understanding the
Gospel? More...
We may all need each other but the wisdom of intolerance informs the communal peace. (Ed.)
|
Educating for Change
Education also allows for the development of attitudes that recognise
that more than one interpretation of Scripture is possible and
indicative of a healthy climate of faith and enquiry.
In a recent discussion between Friends of Unity (FoU) and Graham
Humphris, Moderator South Australian Synod of the Uniting Church in
Australia (UCA), the question was asked of us whether we expected
educational processes to alter the opinion of those who opposed
homosexual persons being in positions of leadership. It was one
of the most impassioned questions to come from the Moderator during the
discussion. More...
|
RESOURCESPrayer Resources are provided by our members and may be read at our web site.
Linking to Uniting Network Resources.
A Wonderful Gift to the Church
Singing while
it is still dark: a gift book of prayers and meditations
for members
of the South Australian Synod 2003
A publication
of Friends of Unity, Adelaide, South Australia.
"Faith
is a bird
that feels
dawn breaking
and sings
while it is
still dark."
ORDERS NOW BEING TAKEN BY MAIL
Cost
per book is $15 plus $2 p&p. GST Free.
ORDERS may be
placed in writing to
Gift Book of
Prayers
PO Box 848
North Adelaide
South Australia
5006.
Please make
cheques or Money Orders payable to Friends of Unity and ensure that your
return address is given.
Register for the Daring Gathering NOW.

EMAIL
Previous Volumes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
|